Answer: Use a stable project ID and a distinct readable version for each review artifact. Keep feedback tied to that exact file and timeline basis.
On this page
Creator Edit Lab editorial project · Updated October 21, 2026 · Original decision framework and illustrative example. No physical product measurement or hands-on benchmark is claimed.
Why the distinction matters
Repeated names such as final.mp4 invite overwriting and ambiguous feedback. Decide whether timecodes refer to timeline time or elapsed file time, especially when an export starts after an in point. Keep a small delivery manifest with filename, date, duration and status. A review version and an approved deliverable should be distinguishable without opening the editor.
A practical sequence
- Choose a concise project ID and monotonically distinct version convention.
- Record the intended range and feedback time basis.
- Export to a new artifact and confirm its saved identity and duration.
- Keep feedback, requested changes and approval status linked to that version.
Decision record
| Check | What it means | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Version | Unique review artifact | Avoid silent overwrite |
| Time basis | Elapsed file or timeline | Feedback locates the right frame |
| Status | Draft, review or approved | No ambiguous final label |
Worked example
A hypothetical client comments at 00:20 on review v03, but v04 has a new eight-second opening. Applying the comment at 00:20 in v04 can target the wrong shot. Preserve v03 and identify the content being discussed before translating the note.
Verify the result
Keep a simple change note with each new review. Approval applies to the reviewed artifact and stated conditions, not every file sharing a similar title. Verify a final package against the approved version.
Download the editable CSV worksheet · Delivery workbook
Question and answer
Should a review filename include every export setting? Use a concise readable ID and keep detailed settings in the manifest. Extremely long filenames are difficult to distinguish in ordinary interfaces.
Sources and scope
- Adobe Premiere: export settings reference — Export, caption and source options; verify your installed release.
The decision sequence, diagrams, worksheet and worked case are our editorial work. AI assisted research, drafting and implementation. Official references support the named technical distinctions; examples do not establish real product performance.
Continue the task
- DaVinci Resolve vs Premiere: choose by workflow
- Plan multicamera recording capacity and playback rate separately
- Browse the complete resource library
Build on what you just learned
Your next useful step.
Organize, relink and restore with confidence.
Upgrade to Resolve 21 with a project-copy acceptance test
I would upgrade a working editing system only after preserving a recoverable project library and testing a representative project copy.
Read the guide →
Resolve 21 IntelliSearch: budget the analysis before relying on search
I would test IntelliSearch on a representative media subset and keep a conventional folder and logging system alongside it.
Read the guide →
